POPULATION PRESSURE AND THE MICROECONOMY OF LAND MANAGEMENT IN HILLS AND MOUNTAINS OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Scott R. Templeton and Sara J. Scherr

No 16110, EPTD Discussion Papers from CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

Abstract: Concerns about harmful environmental impacts are frequently raised in research and policy debates about population growth in the hills and mountains of developing countries. Although establishing wildlife corridors and biosphere reserves is important for preserving selected biodiverse habitats, for the vast majority of hilly-mountainous lands, the major ecological concerns are for the sustainability of local production systems and for watershed integrity. What matters for sustained use of those lands not only is the number of producers but also what, where and how they produce. Indeed, comprehensive evidence from empirical research indicates that population growth in hills and mountains can lead to land enhancement, degradation, or aspects of both. The evidence can be explained by extending induced innovation theory to address environmental impacts of intensification. Increases in the labor-land endowment ratios of households and in local land demand and labor supply make the opportunity cost of land relative to labor increase. As a result, people use hilly-mountainous land resources more intensively for production and consumption, thus tending to deplete resources and significantly alter habitats. But, at the same time, capital- and labor-intensive methods of replenishing or improving soil productivity may become economically more attractive, especially where specific property rights develop. Users will choose production systems that enhance the land if the expected discounted returns are greater than those of systems that degrade the land. In addition to population change, other factors—market conditions, local institutions and organizations, information and technology about resource management, and local ecological conditions—determine the returns from various production systems. Theoretical arguments and empirical evidence about these other determinants of land-improving investment and management are examined. The challenge to researchers and policymakers is to help to configure microeconomic incentives for production that enhance both the land and the welfare of people in these areas.

Keywords: Land; Economics/Use (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 81
Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/16110/files/ept-dp26.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:eptddp:16110

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.16110

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in EPTD Discussion Papers from CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().