Valuation methods for environmental benefits in forestry and watershed investment projects

Romina Cavatassi

No 23799, ESA Working Papers from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA)

Abstract: The understatement or omission of the environmental costs and benefits associated with forest management options results in project evaluations and policy prescriptions that are less than socially optimal. The aim of this paper is to examine the full rang

Keywords: Environmental; Economics; and; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 52
Date: 2004-01-06
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23799/files/wp040001.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Valuation Methods for Environmental Benefits in Forestry and Watershed Investment Projects (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:faoaes:23799

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.23799

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ESA Working Papers from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().