SOCIO-ECONOMIC DIFFERENTIALS IN CHILD STUNTING ARE CONSTENTLY LARGER IN URBAN THAN RURAL AREAS

Purnima Menon, Marie T. Ruel and Saul Sutkover Morris

No 16459, FCND Discussion Papers from CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

Abstract: Urban-rural comparisons of childhood undernutrition suggest that urban populations are better-off than rural populations. However, these comparisons could mask the large differentials that exist among socioeconomic groups in urban areas. Data from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) for 11 countries from three regions were used to test the hypothesis that intra-urban differentials in child stunting were greater than intra-rural differentials, and that the prevalence of stunting among the urban and the rural poor was equally high. A socioeconomic status (SES) index based on household assets, housing quality, and availability of services was created separately for rural and urban areas of each country, using principal components analysis. Odds ratios (OR) were computed to estimate the magnitude of differentials in stunting (height-for-age Z-scores < −2) between urban and rural areas and between the lowest and highest SES quintiles within areas. The prevalence of stunting was lower in urban than in rural areas for all countries, but rural-urban ORs were relatively small (< 3.3). As hypothesized, the gap between low and high SES was markedly larger in urban (median OR = 4) than rural (median OR = 1.8) areas, and differences were statistically significant (interaction between area and SES in logistic regression) in all but three countries. Within-urban ORs as high as 10 were found in Peru and the Dominican Republic, whereas within-rural ORs were smaller than 3.5, except in Brazil. In most countries, stunting in the poorest urban quintile was almost on par with that of poor rural dwellers. Thus, malnutrition in urban areas continues to be of concern, and effective targeting of nutrition programs to the poorest segments of the urban population will be critical to their success and cost-effectiveness.

Keywords: Health; Economics; and; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 34
Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/16459/files/tm000097.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:fcnddp:16459

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.16459

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in FCND Discussion Papers from CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().