Contracting for Impure Public Goods: Carbon Offsets and Additionality

Charles Mason and Andrew J. Plantinga

No 101290, Sustainable Development Papers from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM)

Abstract: Governments contracting with private agents for the provision of an impure public good must contend with agents who would potentially supply the good absent any payments. This additionality problem is centrally important in the use of carbon offsets as part of climate change mitigation. Analyzing optimal contracts for forest carbon sequestration, an important offset category, we conduct a national-scale simulation using results from an econometric model of land-use change. The results indicate that for an increase in forest area of 50 million acres, annual government expenditures with optimal contracts are about $4 billion lower compared than under a uniform subsidy.

Keywords: Environmental; Economics; and; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 38
Date: 2011-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/101290/files/NDL2011-013.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Contracting for Impure Public Goods: Carbon Offsets and Additionality (2011)
Working Paper: Contracting for Impure Public Goods: Carbon Offsets and Additionality (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:feemdp:101290

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.101290

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Sustainable Development Papers from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().