EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparing Price and Non-price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation

Sheila M. Olmstead and Robert Stavins

No 42919, Natural Resources Management Working Papers from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM)

Abstract: Urban water conservation is typically achieved through prescriptive regulations, including the rationing of water for particular uses and requirements for the installation of particular technologies. A significant shift has occurred in pollution control regulations toward market-based policies in recent decades. We offer an analysis of the relative merits of market-based and prescriptive approaches to water conservation, where prices have rarely been used to allocate scarce supplies. The analysis emphasizes the emerging theoretical and empirical evidence that using prices to manage water demand is more cost-effective than implementing non-price conservation programs, similar to results for pollution control in earlier decades. Price-based approaches also have advantages in terms of monitoring and enforcement. In terms of predictability and equity, neither policy instrument has an inherent advantage over the other. As in any policy context, political considerations are important.

Pages: 29
Date: 2008-09
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/42919/files/66-08.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Comparing Price and Non-Price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation (2008) Downloads
Working Paper: Comparing Price and Non-price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation (2008) Downloads
Working Paper: Comparing Price and Non-Price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation (2008) Downloads
Working Paper: Comparing Price and Non-price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation (2008) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:feemnr:42919

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.42919

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Natural Resources Management Working Papers from Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().

 
Page updated 2024-07-05
Handle: RePEc:ags:feemnr:42919