The Relative Efficiency of Voluntary vs. Mandatory Environmental Regulations

JunJie Wu and Bruce A. Babcock

No 18500, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive from Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Abstract: Conservation program administered by USDA have traditionally been voluntary, with USDDA providing technical and fiscal assistance to farmers. This tradition is continued din the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996. Under these programs, farmers commit themselves to adopting a land management practice and, in turn, the government provides technical and financial assistance. Our analysis suggest that these voluntary programs are more efficient than a program that mandates adoption if and only if the per acre social cost of government expenditure under these program is less than the largest per acre farmer loss under the mandatory approach plus the additional implementation and enforcement cost. This necessary and sufficient condition is likely to be satisfied when (a) the deadweight loss from raising the government revue is zero or small, (b) a large proportion of government services is public goods, (c) the area the program targets is large, (d) the price of government services is lower than what farmers would have to pay for equivalent private services, (e) the maximum per acre loss under the mandatory program is large, and (f) the monitoring and enforcement cost is much larger for the mandatory program than for the voluntary program.

Keywords: Environmental; Economics; and; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24
Date: 1996
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/18500/files/wp960172.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:hebarc:18500

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.18500

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Hebrew University of Jerusalem Archive from Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().