'Technical, Objective, Equitable, and Uniform'? A Critique of the Colombian System for the Selection of Beneficiaries of Social Programmes, Sisben

Rosemary McGee

No 30570, General Discussion Papers from University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM)

Abstract: Targeted poverty reduction programmes, advocated in contemporary poverty orthodoxy, heighten the importance of poverty information. Two divergent tendencies are discernible: tightened-up targeting through narrowed eligibility criteria; and a new epistemology of poverty based on qualitative and participatory methods. Statistical and qualitative analysis of findings from research in rural Colombia shows that the former approach is less "technical, objective, equitable and uniform" than it purports to be; and that the latter is more valid than is often appreciated. A good compromise is to combine the two and apply them in a spirit of "self-critical epistemological awareness" (Chambers 1997).

Keywords: Public; Economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 34
Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30570/files/dp980057.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:idpmgd:30570

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.30570

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in General Discussion Papers from University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().