INPUT CHOICES IN AGRICULTURE: IS THERE A GENDER BIAS?
Susan E. Chen and
Gerald Shively ()
No 7328, Working papers from Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics
Most developing countries strive to improve agricultural productivity by relaxing credit constraints, supplying better inputs, and improving marketing and distribution. However the efficacy of these reforms needs to be examined in the context of the behavioral responses of farming households. This study examines gender biases within households that affect short-term decisions with immediate and long-term implications. This study utilizes data from ICRISAT's village level studies in India (1975-85) to highlight the effects of child gender on the use of agricultural inputs. The main finding is that households with boys tend to use purchased inputs such as fertilizers and insecticides more intensively compared with households with girls. In general, household with boys also tend to have larger land holdings, and use animal and human labor to a greater extent than household with girls.
Keywords: Labor; and; Human; Capital (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Input Choices in Agriculture: Is There A Gender Bias? (2011)
Working Paper: INPUT CHOICES IN AGRICULTURE: IS THERE A GENDER BIAS? (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:puaewp:7328
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working papers from Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().