Modeling Marketing Services and Assessing Their Welfare Impacts in a General Equilibrium Framework

Scott Bradford and Alexandre Gohin

No 330948, Conference papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project

Abstract: Since nearly every good purchased by consumers must pass through the distribution (or marketing) sector, it plays an important role in any modern economy, exerting a strong influence on prices and overall welfare. Most Applied General Equilibrium (AGE) models, however, do not explicitly account for marketing. These models assume that consumers pay producer prices (corrected for taxes and subsidies) and that all distribution services can be lumped into a single sector. In reality, consumer prices are substantially higher than producer prices, and the gap between the two depends on the good being purchased and on the purchaser. Accounting for these facts requires explicit modeling of marketing. Failure to do so within an AGE model may lead to misleading results and will prevent one from analyzing the welfare effects of changes within this crucial sector. In this paper, we explicitly model marketing within an AGE framework. For the first time, to our knowledge, we compare two alternative approaches to such modeling with each other and with the standard approach of not modeling marketing. We do so by running trade opening simulations using each approach. We find that modeling marketing may have a large influence on trade simulations in some cases, while, in other cases, it probably does not. We also exploit our modeling to explore the possible welfare effects of increased efficiency in marketing. We find large potential gains. For the EU and the US, a mere 3% reduction in final goods marketing margins would create the same benefits for these regions as worldwide free trade. For Japan, it would only take a 10% reduction in its high margins. Thus, modest improvements in marketing efficiency may be more beneficial than any possible trade agreement. We also find that reducing margins has a smaller affect on production than does trade opening, so that streamlining distribution may be politically more feasible than trade opening.

Keywords: Marketing; Research Methods/Statistical Methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 18
Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330948/files/452.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:pugtwp:330948

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Conference papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().