Sustainable Development and Globalization in a World with Unequal Starting Points

Brantley Liddle

No 331183, Conference papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project

Abstract: We develop a simulation model, borrowing from and integrating aspects of economics, demography, and environmental and political science, to simultaneously consider environment, economic development, and population/politics by focusing specifically on the impact of important flows (i.e., pollution, capital, technology, production goods, natural resources, and people). The model can assess sustainable development on three levels: economic (by determining production, consumption, investment, direct foreign investment, foreign aid, technology transfer, and international trade), social (by calculating population growth/change, migration flows, and political stress levels), and environmental (by calculating natural resource use and the difference between environmental pollution and upgrading expenditures). We use the model to explore the challenges of development for countries with different initial conditions (i.e., natural resource endowment, physical and human capital, technology, and population) in a world with movement of goods, people, and capital, free substitution in production, flexible economic structures, and the ability to upgrade input factors via investment. We find that, rather than the total physical capacity of the earth being responsible for unsustainable paths, the initial disparities in circumstances among countries and the complex of internal and international human interrelationships can lead to a “social non sustainability”. The greatest challenge for rich countries (given their aging populations) is maintaining sufficient investment, and the greatest poverty trap for poor countries (given their subsistence consumption) is attaining high investment. The impact of globalization (i.e., the international flow of goods, people, and capital) on various countries differs depending on their to starting points, and this relationship can change over time. The modal behavior of the model can be either convergence or divergence among countries depending on the extent of these global flows and the degree to which individual countries can manage them. In general, capital flows (when accompanied by technology transfer) tend to benefit all countries, migration tends to benefit the destination countries (particularly the aging, rich) and the migrants themselves, and the benefits of trade can be either positive or negative depending on country endowments.

Keywords: Research Methods/Statistical Methods; Environmental Economics and Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331183/files/1484.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Chapter: Sustainable Development and Globalization in a World with Unequal Starting Points (2006)
Journal Article: Sustainable Development and Globalization in a World with Unequal Starting Points (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331183

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Conference papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().