Sectoral aggregation bias in the accounting of emissions embodied in trade and consumption

Da Zhang, Justin Caron, Niven Winchester and Valerie J. Karplus

No 332330, Conference papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project

Abstract: Correctly accounting for the emissions embodied in consumption and trade is essential to effective climate policy design. Robust methods are needed for both policy and research—for example, the assignment of border carbon adjustments (BCAs) and emissions reduction responsibilities rely on the consistency and accuracy of such estimates. This analysis investigates the potential magnitude and consequences of the bias present in estimates of emissions embodied in trade and consumption. To quantify the bias of embodied-emissions accounting, we compare the results from the disaggregated Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP 8) data set which contains 57 sectors to results from different levels of aggregation of this dataset (3, 7, 16 and 26 sectors) using 5,000 randomly generated sectoral aggregation schemes as well as aggregations generated using several commonly-applied decisions rules. We find that some commonlyapplied decision rules for sectoral aggregation can produce a large bias. We further show that an aggregation scheme that clusters sectors according to their emissions and trade intensities can minimize bias in embodied emissions accounting at different levels of aggregation. This sectoral aggregation principle can be readily used in any input-output analysis and provide useful information for computable general equilibrium modeling exercises in which sector aggregation is necessary, although our findings suggest that, when possible, the most disaggregated data available should be used.

Keywords: Environmental Economics and Policy; International Relations/Trade (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332330/files/6192.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332330

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Conference papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().