Poverty and Shared Prosperity Implications of Deep Integration in Eastern and Southern Africa

Edward Balistreri, Maryla Maliszewska, Israel Osorio-Rodarte, David Tarr and Hidemichi Yonezawa
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Israel Osorio Rodarte

No 332681, Conference papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project

Abstract: Evidence indicates that trade costs are a much more substantial barrier to trade than tariffs, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. We decompose trade costs into: (i) trade facilitation; (ii) non-tariff barriers; and (iii) the costs of business services. We assess the poverty and shared prosperity impacts of deep integration to reduce these three types of trade costs in: (i) the East African Customs Union (EACU)-COMESA-SADC “Tripartite” FTA; (ii) within the EACU alone; and (iii) unilaterally by the EACU. We employ an innovative multi-region computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to estimate the changes in the macroeconomic variables that impact poverty and shared prosperity. We utilize the CGE model estimates in the Global Income Distribution Dynamics (GIDD) microsimulation model to obtain assessments of the changes in the poverty headcount and shared prosperity for each of our simulations for each of our six African regions or countries. We find that these reforms are pro-poor. There are significant reductions in the poverty headcount and the percentage of the population living in poverty for all six of our African regions from deep integration in the Tripartite FTA or comparable unilateral reforms by the EACU. Further, the incomes of the bottom forty percent of the populations noticeably increase in all countries or regions of our model that are engaged in the trade reforms. The reason the poor share in the prosperity is due importantly to the fact that the reforms increase unskilled wages faster than rewards of other factors of production, as the reforms tend to favor agriculture. Despite the uniform increases in income for the poorest 40 percent, we find some cases where the share of income captured by the poorest 40 percent of the population decreases. We find that the estimated gains vary considerably across countries and reforms. Thus, countries would have an interest in negotiating for different reforms in different agreements.

Keywords: Food; Security; and; Poverty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332681/files/7844.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Poverty and shared prosperity implications of deep integration in Eastern and Southern Africa (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332681

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Conference papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().