Economic and environmental implications of a target for bioplastics consumption: A CGE analysis

Neus Escobar, Salwa Haddad and Wolfgang Britz

No 332940, Conference papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project

Abstract: Bioplastic production is a small but fast growing sector in the Bioeconomy despite the so far limited policy support. We simulate the expansion of bioplastic supply towards a 5% target relative to current total plastic consumption in leading producing regions. We introduce fossil-based plastics and bioplastics in the GTAP 9 database, coupled to greenhouse gas (GHG) indicators; then simulate two policy scenarios, where scenario 1 subsidizes bioplastics consumption, while scenario 2 increases taxes on fossil plastics. Both alternatives promote bioplastic production, with subsequent price effects due to the increase in demand for starch- and sugar-based feedstocks at global scale. The tax in scenario 2 makes plastics as an aggregate more expensive, leading to a contraction of all sectors that employ plastics either directly or indirectly. Global real GDP stays almost constant in scenario 1, but drops by 0.07% in scenario 2, implying greater distortions by differentiated taxation of a larger sector. Our study is the first to quantify emissions from indirect Land Use Change (iLUC) due to growing bioplastics demand. Given the current production technologies relying on food crops, the target triggers cropland expansion and increased GHG emissions globally. The latter increase by +1.44% in scenario 1 and by +2.07% in scenario 2, where a greater loss of carbon stocks from managed forest areas is observed, due to the lower wood demand for energy and material uses in other sectors. The cost-effectiveness of the bioplastic target is calculated at -14.53 and -61.59 US$ per t CO2-eq. for scenarios 1 and 2, respectively. We show that CGE models are useful to analyze economic and environmental impacts of Bioeconomy transformations and more generally the food-fuel-fiber debate. Future bioplastic strategies should focus on biodegradability rather than on the biological origin of the feedstock, in order to drive the transition to resource-efficient and low-carbon economies.

Keywords: Environmental; Economics; and; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332940/files/9057.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Economic and environmental implications of a target for bioplastics consumption: A CGE analysis (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332940

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Conference papers from Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().