Habitat Benefit Assessment and Decision-making: A Report to the National Marine Fisheries Service

James Boyd, James Sanchirico () and Leonard Shabman

No 10904, Discussion Papers from Resources for the Future

Abstract: Habitats and the services they provide are part of our nation's portfolio of natural capital assets. As for many components of this portfolio, it is difficult to assess the value of their services, and this complicates regulators' investment decisions, especially when the alternative use is measurable. The principal objective of this report is to suggest possible strategies for the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) as it applies economic analyses and arguments in support of the agency's trustee responsibilities. Many approaches are possible, and as we discuss, the "right" strategy will depend on the questions asked, the resources available, and the agency's role in the consultation process. We discuss in detail bioeconomic modeling and ecosystem indicator approaches to habitat value assessment. Although the approaches are discussed independently, multiple tools could be used simultaneously across different regions or within the same region on different aspects of one consultation.

Keywords: Resource/Energy; Economics; and; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 79
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/10904/files/dp040009.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Habitat Benefit Assessment and Decisionmaking: A Report to the National Marine Fisheries Service (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:rffdps:10904

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.10904

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from Resources for the Future Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().