FAIR, POSTFAIR, AND NOFAIR: A COMPARISON OF CROPPING ALTERNATIVES FOR THE SOUTHERN GREAT PLAINS

Jon T. Biermacher, Francis Epplin () and Kent R. Keim

No 35211, 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama from Southern Agricultural Economics Association

Abstract: The Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 was promoted as legislation that would enable and encourage farmers to base planting decisions on market incentives rather than commodity programs. Data from a designed experiment are used to compare the economics of three cropping systems for alternative commodity programs.

Keywords: Crop; Production/Industries (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 17
Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/35211/files/sp03bi01.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:saeatm:35211

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.35211

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama from Southern Agricultural Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().