Economic Writing on the Pressing Problems of the Day: The Roles of Moral Intuition and Methodological Confusion

Julie Nelson

No 179069, Working Papers from Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute

Abstract: Economists are often called on to help address pressing problems of the day, yet many economists are uncomfortable about disclosing the values that they bring to this work. This essay explores how an inadequate understanding of the role of methodology, as related to ethics and human emotions of concern, underlies this reluctance and compromises the quality of economic advice. The tension between caring about the problems, on the one hand, and writing within the existing culture of the discipline, on the other, are illustrated with examples from U.S. policymaking, behavioral economics, and the economics of climate change and global poverty. Potential steps towards a more responsible, "strongly objective," and policy-useful economics are discussed.

Keywords: Environmental Economics and Policy; Food Security and Poverty; Institutional and Behavioral Economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009-04
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/179069/files/09-03EconWriting.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Economic Writing on the Pressing Problems of the Day: The Roles of Moral Intuition and Methodological Confusion
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:tugdwp:179069

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.179069

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().