Poisoning the Well, or How Economic Theory Damages Moral Imagination

Julie Nelson

No 179107, Working Papers from Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute

Abstract: Contemporary mainstream economics has widely “poisoned the well” from which people get their ideas about the relationship between economics and ethics. The image of economic life as inherently characterized by self-interest, utility- and profit-maximization, and mechanical controllability has caused many businesspeople, judges, sociologists, philosophers, policymakers, critics of economics, and the public at large to come to tolerate greed and opportunism, or even to expect or encourage them. This essay raises and discusses a number of counterarguments that might be made to the charge that current dominant professional practice is having negative ethical effects, as well as discussing some examples of the harms inflicted in the areas of law, care work, the environment, and ethics itself.

Keywords: Institutional; and; Behavioral; Economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-12
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/179107/files/12-07NelsonPoisoningWell.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:tugdwp:179107

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.179107

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().