Beneficial Management Practice (BMP) Adoption -- Direct Farm Cost/Benefit Tradeoffs
Dawn Trautman,
Scott R. Jeffrey and
Jim Unterschultz
No 139638, Project Report Series from University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology
Abstract:
Monte Carlo simulation was used to examine the on-farm economics from adoption of Beneficial Management Practices (BMPs) on four representative Alberta cropping farms. Adoption of shelterbelts, buffer strips, residue management, and the addition of annual and perennial forages, field peas, and oats in crop rotations were included as BMPs that contribute positively to Ecological Goods and Services production from agriculture. Results suggest positive on-farm benefits associated with perennial forage and field pea BMPs. Conversely, BMPs that reduce availability of land for cropping activities, such as shelterbelts and buffer strips, and BMPs that do not increase revenues, such as oats and annual forages in rotation, are costly to producers. The results presented and discussed in this report have important policy implications. Policy mechanisms that incorporate positive mechanisms may improve adoption of BMPs that are costly to producers, while extension mechanisms, such as information programs, may improve the adoption of economically feasible BMPs.
Keywords: Crop Production/Industries; Farm Management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 123
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/139638/files/PR-12-02.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ualbpr:139638
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.139638
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Project Report Series from University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().