EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Rural Decline and the Farm Crisis: Two Marginally Related Issues

Richard J. Haigh and Adrienne L. Kisko

No 232431, Staff Paper Series from University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology

Abstract: The current crisis in Canadian agriculture is well documented. Researchers are pointing to the declining ability of farmers to support local communities as a result of cost-price squeezes and high debt loads. These problems have been directly associated with the rural community crisis, which in Alberta is one of dwindling populations, an aging demographic base and depressed local economies. There is little doubt that the crisis in these two sectors is real, but the suggested linkages between them are open to question. The survivability of rural communities is not exclusively tied to agricultural profits. While beleaguered Alberta farmers seem to be compounding their reduced spending .by trading with nearby cities rather than the local community, of even greater relevance is the presence of industries which encourage population growth. Agriculture is no longer a major contributor to the creation of rural employment, particularly in prairie Canada where the technologies of extensive production have replaced labor inputs with capital investment. The argument being presented here is that the crisis of rural communities is related to the crisis in agriculture only to the extent of reduced local spending. This is a serious problem, but the major issue is one of dwindling populations. The decline of agricultural jobs in Alberta is for the most part, not the product of the crisis. To the contrary, it represents a long term trend toward mechanization and increased efficiency. Studies conducted in this province suggest that the survival of rural communities is increasingly tied to urban economies and values. Those communities which are able to attract urban industrial developments or provide a residential base for urban workers clearly show the greatest propensity for future growth. Inevitably this is producing a spatial bias in their distribution across the rural landscape.

Keywords: Community/Rural/Urban; Development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 15
Date: 1989-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/232431/files/ualberta-staffpapers-89-08.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ualbsp:232431

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.232431

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Staff Paper Series from University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ags:ualbsp:232431