A COMPARISON OF VARIOUS FRONTIER ESTIMATION METHODS UNDER DIFFERING DATA GENERATION ASSUMPTIONS
Daniel M. Settlage,
Bruce L. Dixon and
Michael R. Thomsen
No 15773, Staff Papers from University of Arkansas, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness
Abstract:
Monte Carlo methods examine the accuracy of several production frontier approximating forms, estimators and methods to rank firms by level of predicted technical efficiency. Results show stochastic frontier methods superior to data envelopment analysis. The Cobb-Douglas approximating form is superior to the translog or generalized Leontief.
Keywords: Research; Methods/; Statistical; Methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21
Date: 2000
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/15773/files/sp062000.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:uarksp:15773
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.15773
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Staff Papers from University of Arkansas, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().