Determinants of Bilateral Food Related Disputes
Christian Götz and
Thomas Heckelei
No 162893, Discussion Papers from University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics
Abstract:
This paper analyses relevant determinants for the probability to initiate a dispute on policy measures under the World Trade Organization (WTO) Dispute Settlement Mechanism (DSM). The empirical analysis focuses on agrofood related disputes to provide sector specific information on the driving factors in dispute settlement, and complements and extends previous studies by incorporating new potential determinants. The focus is shifted to bilaterally dependent characteristics to take care of trade related and power based relationships between Members, such as relevance of the defendant’s market and the complainant’s trade related retaliation capacity. Contrary to recent analyses of overall trade disputes, the results show that capacity-related determinants such as financial means and legal capacity and simple trade-related characteristics like export and import volume do not show a statistically significant impact on dispute initiation in the agro-food sector. However, the level of protectionism that Members face in their export markets, their operating experience with the DSM, the influence of private sector interests, complainants’ agrofood related export dependency as well as the size of their agro-food imports from the defendant party could be identified as relevant determinants of dispute initiation behavior.
Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy; International Relations/Trade (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 18
Date: 2011-11-04
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/162893/files/dispap11_03.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Determinants of Bilateral Food Related Disputes (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ubfred:162893
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.162893
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Papers from University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().