CONTRACT MARKETING IN THE US AFTER THE 2002 FARM ACT: THE CASE OF PEANUTS
Cesar Revoredo-Giha,
Denis A. Nadolnyak and
Stanley M. Fletcher
No 31930, Environmental Economy and Policy Research Discussion Papers from University of Cambridge, Department of Land Economy
Abstract:
The elimination of the marketing quota system that regulated the peanut market since the 1930s has been accompanied by the emergence of marketing contracts between farmers and peanut buyers (mainly peanut shellers). Two types of contracts have been observed, forward contracts for delivery at harvest or at a later date and "option to purchase" contracts. We analyze the clauses of contracts used by major shellers in order to infer the motivation behind these contracts (i.e., risk sharing, reduction of transaction costs, improve coordination, exercise of market power, etc.). The analysis points out that the main role of the contracts is to replace the marketing structure existing prior the 2002 Farm Act, where peanut marketing was quite regulated. In this sense, the reduction of transaction costs associated to the need for coordinating a continuous supply of homogeneous quality seems to be the most plausible explanation.
Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy; Crop Production/Industries; Marketing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 15
Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31930/files/dp050011.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: Contract Marketing in the US after the 2002 Farm Act: The Case of Peanuts (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ucamdp:31930
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31930
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Environmental Economy and Policy Research Discussion Papers from University of Cambridge, Department of Land Economy Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().