 NATURAL RESOURCE ABUNDANCE AND ECONOMIC GROWTH REVISITEDNo 25127, Berkeley Economics Dissertations-in-Progress Series from University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics Abstract: Data on energy and mineral reserves suggest that natural resource abundance has not been a significant structural determinant of economic growth between 1970 and 1989. The story behind the effect of natural resources on economic growth is a complex one that typical growth regressions do not capture well. Preliminary evidence suggests that natural resources may affect economic growth through both "positive" and "negative channels." Potential reverse causality running from these "channels" to fuel and mineral reserves further complicates the analysis. I conjecture that, as economic historians suggest, the ability of a country to exploit its resource base depends critically on the nature of the learning process involved. Keywords: International Development; Resource/Energy Economics and Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ucbeed:25127 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Berkeley Economics Dissertations-in-Progress Series from University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.