High Cereal Prices and the Prospects for Relied by Expansion of Private Label and Antitrust Enforcement
Ronald Cotterill
No 161555, Issue Papers from University of Connecticut, Food Marketing Policy Center
Abstract:
Congressmen Gejdenson and Schumer should be commended for their persistent interest in the performance of the ready to eat cereal industry. The release of their well documented and thorough report, "Consumers in a Box" a year ago focused media attention on high cereal prices, which in turn documented widespread consumer anger over this industry's performance. Today, the Congressmen have asked for an assessment of the factors that contribute to high cereal prices, and the outlook for consumer relief from the expansion of private label cereals, and more effective antitrust enforcement. This is no small task. I would like to begin by responding to the industry's rebuttal to the Congressmen's report. None of the cereal manufacturers has commented publicly on the Congressional inquiry. Instead, they have designated Mr. Jeffrey Nedelman of the Grocery Manufacturers of America as their common spokesman. The GMA's entire written response consists of a three page press release that contains seven "facts". The fact sheet is reproduced in the appendix.
Keywords: Consumer/Household Economics; Food Security and Poverty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 42
Date: 1996-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/161555/files/ip11.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ucofmi:161555
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.161555
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Issue Papers from University of Connecticut, Food Marketing Policy Center Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().