REFORMING OUTDATED FENCE LAW PROVISIONS: GOOD FENCES MAKE GOOD NEIGHBORS ONLY IF THEY ARE FAIR
Terence Centner
No 16688, Faculty Series from University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics
Abstract:
Conflicts between persons engaged in animal husbandry and their neighbors have given legislative bodies many challenges in responding to competing equities. One set of rules has concerned the enclosure of domestic livestock, and legislative bodies have adopted assorted fence rules to resolve competing interests associated with grazing by domestic animals. Alternative fence-out legislation still exists in some jurisdictions for open range and very rural areas. Under fence-out legislation, ranchers do not have to build fences to confine their animals; rather, persons who want to keep out stray livestock have the burden of putting up a fence. Economists have given considerable attention to the externalities posed by livestock and the economic consequences of fence-in and fence-out rules, but have not considered the entire spectrum of scientific knowledge regarding the selection of a preferred rule. This paper addresses recent agro-research strategies and the comparison of property versus liability rule protection.
Keywords: Livestock; Production/Industries (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 18
Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/16688/files/fs9722.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ugeofs:16688
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.16688
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Faculty Series from University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().