Pricing-to-Market: Price Discrimination or Product Differentiation?
Nathalie Lavoie and
Qihong Liu ()
No 14524, Working Paper Series from University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Department of Resource Economics
Abstract:
We employ a vertical differentiation model to examine the potential bias in pricing-to-market (PTM) results when using unit values aggregating differentiated products. Our results show that: i) false evidence of PTM ("pseudo PTM") is always found when using unit values, whether the law of one price holds or not; and ii) the extent to which results are biased due to pseudo PTM increases with the level of product differentiation. Correspondingly, our simulation results suggest that: i) it is possible to get a statistically significant estimate of the exchange rate coefficient, even when there is no real PTM; ii) the probability of a false PTM finding increases with product differentiation. Pseudo PTM is the result of a change in the mix of qualities imported when the exchange rate changes.
Keywords: Demand and Price Analysis; Marketing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 23
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/14524/files/wp040011.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Pricing-to-Market: Price Discrimination or Product Differentiation? (2007) 
Working Paper: Pricing-to-Market: Price Discrimination or Product Differentiation? (2004) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:umamwp:14524
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.14524
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Paper Series from University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Department of Resource Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().