Financing Nature Reserves in China: The Case of The State Nature Reserve of Xishuangbanna, Yunnan: Financial Issues, Political Economy and Conservation

Clement Tisdell and Zhu Xiang

No 145210, Biodiversity Conservation: Studies in its Economics and Management, Mainly in Yunnan China from University of Queensland, School of Economics

Abstract: Available funds for protecting and managing nature reserves are extremely limited in developing countries, including China. This article considers the financing and management of Xishuangbanna State Nature Reserve in Yunnan as a case study. This Reserve is under the overall management of the Bureau for the Protection of Xishuangbanna State Nature Reserve but there is considerable decentralisation in the management of its five sub-reserves. These are managed from four stations, one for each of the sub-reserves except for Mengla and Shangyang sub-reserves which share the same station. The source of funds for the Reserve and sub-reserves are listed and the nature of outlays are specified. Almost all available funds are spent on salaries wages and pensions for staff of the Reserve, leaving few funds for overheads, transport and other items, especially capital items. Government is the principal source of funding, but some income is obtained from ecotourism, from a butterfly farm and factory for processing butterflies, from multiple use operations such as rental income from concessions to grow passionfruit in parts of the Reserve, and from resource management fees such as fines imposed for illegal use of the Reserve and payments for the controlled removal of timber and wood from the Reserve. Political influences on financing are discussed It is suggested that the high ratio of expenditure on staffing to total expenditure can be partly explained by political considerations. It is, however, observed that actual salaries paid to employees of the Reserve. are very low, even by Chinese standards. Given the shortage of discretionary funds available to the Reserve, especially for capital goods and investment, substantial progress with the latter items is dependent on foreign aid. In this respect WWF(Europe) has been one of the most important donors to date. In the future, some funds for such purposes may also become available from the Global Environmental Facility.

Keywords: Environmental Economics and Policy; Financial Economics; Political Economy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 14
Date: 1995-05
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/145210/files/WP17.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:uqsebd:145210

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.145210

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Biodiversity Conservation: Studies in its Economics and Management, Mainly in Yunnan China from University of Queensland, School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().