Conservation policies, environmental valuation and the optimal size of jurisdictions

Giovanni Concu

No 149864, Risk and Sustainable Management Group Working Papers from University of Queensland, School of Economics

Abstract: The size of a jurisdiction is crucial in determining the efficiency, equity or efficacy of environmental regulations. However, jurisdictions are usually taken to coincide with political boundaries even if environmental externalities may transcend them. This paper illustrates the design and implementation of a Choice Modelling experiment to determine the spatial distribution of environmental benefits of Kings Park (Western Australia). The objective is to understand if federal, state or local resources are the appropriate form of funding a conservation policy. Results indicate that there are interstate spillovers of benefits, hence justifying federal contributions to Kings Park. They also show that some benefits are homogeneously spread within Western Australia, and this is an indication that state funding is also appropriate. Other benefits are distance-dependent; some level of local/council funding is warranted.

Keywords: Environmental; Economics; and; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30
Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/149864/files/WPM06_8.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Conservation policies, environmental valuation and the optimal size of jurisdictions (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:uqsers:149864

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.149864

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Risk and Sustainable Management Group Working Papers from University of Queensland, School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().