Bargaining power and efficiency in insurance contracts

John Quiggin and Robert G. Chambers

No 151182, Risk and Sustainable Management Group Working Papers from University of Queensland, School of Economics

Abstract: Insurance contracts are frequently modelled as principal--agent relationships. Although it is commonly assumed that the principal, in this case the insurer, has complete freedom to design the contract, the problem formulation in much of the principal--agent literature presumes that the contract is constrained-Pareto-efficient. In the present paper, we consider the implications of a richer specification of the choices available to clients. In particular, we consider the entire spectrum of possible power differentials in the contracting relationship between insurers and clients. Our central result is that the agent can exploit information asymmetries to offset the bargaining power of the insurer, but that this process is socially costly.

Keywords: Institutional and Behavioral Economics; Research Methods/ Statistical Methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21
Date: 2005-04-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/151182/files/WPR07_5.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Bargaining Power and Efficiency in Insurance Contracts (2009)
Working Paper: Bargaining power and efficiency in insurance contracts (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:uqsers:151182

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.151182

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Risk and Sustainable Management Group Working Papers from University of Queensland, School of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().