Hearing With Reference to a Proposed Sugar Marketing Agreement, as Revised July 18, 1933

Frank Roberson and Agricultural Adjustment Administration

No 404140, USDA Miscellaneous from United States Department of Agriculture

Abstract: [Partial Contents:] Proposed Agreement Highly Discriminatory in Favor of Continental Cane Refiners --- Refiners’ Telegram to President Roosevelt --- Differences in Wages for Labor a Minor Factor in Refining Costs --- Advantages in Cuban Refining Claimed by Domestic Refiners Before Tariff Commission --- Imports of Refined Sugar Do Not Affect Beet Farmers --- American Labor and Industry Benefited Rather Than Injured by Cuban Refining --- Cuban Sugar Necessary to the United States in the Event of War --- Domestic Cane Refiners Not Entitled to Special Privileges --- Agreement Has No Safeguard to the Consumer --- Comments on Certain Specific Provisions in Proposed Agreement.

Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy; Crop Production/Industries; International Relations/Trade; Labor and Human Capital; Marketing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 44
Date: 1933-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404140/files/HearingSugarAgreement-1933.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:usdami:404140

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404140

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in USDA Miscellaneous from United States Department of Agriculture
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().