Influence of Type of Hog on Production Efficiency
J. H. Zeller and
H. O. Hetzer
No 404216, USDA Miscellaneous from United States Department of Agriculture
Abstract:
Report Introduction: Market demand has always played an important part in determining the type of hogs predominantly raised in this country. The small type was the favorite among breeders of the pure breeds from about 1880 to 1900. Soon after 1900 the small type began to lose its popularity and by 1915 was replaced generally by a type commonly called intermediate. During World War I the pendulum began the swing toward an excessively large type, which reached its climax about the middle of the 1920's. Agitation for a return to an intermediate type got under way, and by 1935 the trend in that direction was well established. However, there has been more or less confusion among hog breeders and farmers for a half century with respect to the type of hog most profitable to the producer and most suitable to the market. Extremely small and extremely large types are still found on farms throughout the country. Although large, intermediate, and small types of hogs have been studied extensively with respect to their economic characters, the results obtained have not always been in agreement and uncertainty still prevails.
Keywords: Livestock Production/Industries; Marketing; Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 20
Date: 1944-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404216/files/DeptCircular698.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:usdami:404216
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404216
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in USDA Miscellaneous from United States Department of Agriculture
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().