Divergence between WTA and WTP Revisited: Livestock Grazing on Public Range
Gerrit van Kooten and
Graham Voss ()
No 37014, Working Papers from University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy
The research reported here provides further empirical support for the contention that there is a divergence between WTA and WTP. The conclusion is based on results from a 2002 survey of Nevada ranchers that asked about willingness to pay for public forage and WTA compensation to part with grazing rights. WTP and WTA are estimated simultaneously, with the estimators used to demonstrate a statistically significant divergence between WTP and WTA. The simultaneous estimation allows us to identify ranch characteristics that influence the discrepancy in valuations. Ranch size, public grazing allotment, financial distress, and long term commitment to ranching are all significant influences on the disparity. We interpret these results both with respect to general differences in welfare measures and with respect to ranch policy.
Keywords: Agribusiness; Land Economics/Use (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Divergence between WTA and WTP Revisited: Livestock Grazing on Public Range (2005)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:uvicwp:37014
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().