Outward-Orientation and Development: Are Revisionists Right?

T. Srinivasan and Jagdish Bhagwati

No 28476, Center Discussion Papers from Yale University, Economic Growth Center

Abstract: The costs of import substitution (IS) as a strategy for industrialization, which was deemed synonymous with economic development by many development economists of the fifties and sixties, were shown to be substantial in the influential and nuanced studies of the seventies and eighties under the auspices of OECD, NBER and World Bank. These studies played a critical role in shifting policies in several developing countries away from the IS strategy. Recently there has been a proliferation of cross country regressions as a methodology of analysis of issues relating to growth, trade and other issues. Both proponents (e.g. Sachs and Warner (1995)) and opponents (Rodriguez and Rodrik (1999)) of the view that openness to trade is linked to higher growth have relied on such regressions. The paper systematically reviews the theoretical and empirical studies on such linkage. It rejects the cross-country regression methodology for reasons of their weak theoretical foundation, poor quality of their data base and their inappropriate econometric methodologies. It argues that the most compelling evidence on this issue can come only from careful case studies of policy regimes of individual entries such as those of OECD, NBER and World Bank. It concludes that the virtues of openness established in these nuanced in-depth studies remain unrefuted.

Keywords: International; Development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 46
Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (78)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/28476/files/dp990806.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Chapter: Outward-Orientation and Development: Are Revisionists Right? (2001)
Working Paper: Outward-Orientation and Development: Are Revisionists Right (1999)
Working Paper: Outward-Orientation and Development: Are Revisionist Right? (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:yaleeg:28476

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.28476

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Center Discussion Papers from Yale University, Economic Growth Center Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().