Optimal Choice between Defined Contribution and Cash Balance Pension Schemes: Balancing Interests of Employers and Workers

Vanessa Hanna () and Pierre Devolder ()
Additional contact information
Vanessa Hanna: Université catholique de Louvain, LIDAM/ISBA, Belgium
Pierre Devolder: Université catholique de Louvain, LIDAM/ISBA, Belgium

No 2023022, LIDAM Reprints ISBA from Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA)

Abstract: In the context of pension plans, the employer and the worker have distinct interests and face different risks. The worker seeks higher retirement benefits, while the employer aims to minimize the cost of fulfilling his obligations. To address these diverse needs, the defined contribution plan managed with participating life insurance (DC-PL) and the cash balance plan managed with unit-linked insurance (CB-UL) serve as suitable choices. The multi-criteria analysis is conducted using the cumulative prospect theory model to measure the utility of the parties involved toward a mixed product combining these two pension plans. By assigning weights to risk measures and maximizing utilities, the paper employs both additive utility and Nash equilibrium approaches. The results reveal that the CB-UL plan aligns with employers’ interests, offering potential financial gains, while the DC-PL plan attracts workers due to its profit-sharing aspect. Significantly, when equal importance is given to both parties, the CB-UL plan emerges as the prevailing choice. This study contributes to the understanding of pension plan design and decision-making dynamics between employers and workers, providing valuable insights for achieving a balance between retirement benefits and cost management.

Keywords: Cash balance; defined contribution; participating contract; unit-linked contract; cumulative prospect theory; multi-criteria approach (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21
Date: 2023-07-21
Note: In: Risks, 2023, vol. 11(7), 135
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aiz:louvar:2023022

DOI: 10.3390/risks11070135

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LIDAM Reprints ISBA from Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA) Voie du Roman Pays 20, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium). Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nadja Peiffer ().