EXPERIMENTS ON PORTFOLIO SELECTION: A COMPARISON BETWEEN QUANTILE PREFERENCES AND EXPECTED UTILITY DECISION MODELS
Gabriel Montes-Rojas (),
Luciano de Castro,
Antonio Galvao,
Jeong Yeol Kim and
Jose Olmo
No 2021-68, Documentos de trabajo del Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política IIEP (UBA-CONICET) from Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política IIEP (UBA-CONICET)
Abstract:
This paper conducts a laboratory experiment to assess the optimal allocation under quantile preferences (QP) and compares the model predictions with those of a meanvariance (MV) utility function. We estimate the aversion coefficients associated to the individuals’ empirical portfolio under the QP and MV theories, and evaluate the relative predictive of each theory. The experiment assesses individuals’ preferences through a portfolio choice experiment constructed from two assets that may include a risk-free asset. The results of the experiment con rm the suitability of both to predict individuals’ optimal choices. Furthermore, the aggregation of results by individual choices o ers support to the MV theory. However, the aggregation of results by task, which is more informative, provides more support to the QP theory. The overall message that emerges from this experiment is that individuals’ behavior is better predicted by the MV model when it is di cult to assess the differences in the lotteries’ payoff distributions but better described as QP maximizers, otherwise.
Keywords: Optimal asset allocation; Quantile preferences; Portfolio theory; Risk attitude; Predictive ability test (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D81 G11 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 41 pages
Date: 2021-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://iiep-baires.econ.uba.ar/uploads/publicaciones/540/archivos/1.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to iiep-baires.econ.uba.ar:443 (No such host is known. )
Related works:
Journal Article: Experiments on portfolio selection: A comparison between quantile preferences and expected utility decision models (2022) 
Working Paper: Experiments on Portfolio Selection: A comparison between quantile preferences and expected utility decision models (2021) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ake:iiepdt:202168
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Documentos de trabajo del Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política IIEP (UBA-CONICET) from Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política IIEP (UBA-CONICET) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by IIEP UBA-CONICET ().