Are US antidumping cases being crowded out by other forms of protectionism? A natural experiment
Prashant Desai and
Robert Feinberg ()
No 2019-01, Working Papers from American University, Department of Economics
The issue of substitutability between various modes of import protection has been studied by economists in various ways. Since President Donald Trump came into office and soon started imposing tariffs, the need by US firms to file antidumping (AD) cases would seem to have been reduced. We explain quarterly US AD filings, based on data from 1995 through 2016, and then predict US AD petitions for 2017 and 2018. We reject a hypothesis of substitution away from AD in the Trump era of general protectionism, but do find some support for the notion that protection moves downstream, with greater than predicted AD filings in downstream metals sectors.
Keywords: Antidumping; trade policy substitution; Trump tariffs (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-int
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.17606/ajk8-rj19 First version, 2019 (application/pdf)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:amu:wpaper:2019-01
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from American University, Department of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Meal ().