The European Supplemental Poverty Measure: A Poverty Measure that Better Identifies Financially Disadvantaged Households

Zachary Parolin (), Lewis Anderson (), Selçuk Bedük () and Solhee Han ()
Additional contact information
Zachary Parolin: The Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford
Lewis Anderson: The Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School (INET Oxford)
Selçuk Bedük: The Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School (INET Oxford)
Solhee Han: The Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School (INET Oxford)

INET Oxford Working Papers from Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford

Abstract: The European Union's headline poverty indicator, the at-risk-of-poverty rate (AROP), counts a person as poor when their household's equivalised disposable income falls below 60 percent of the national median. The measure faces well-documented limitations, namely its sensitivity to median income declines (e.g., during economic recessions), inability to account for changes in prices, and the different living standards that a common percentage of the median represents across Member States. We construct an alternative poverty measure – the European Supplemental Poverty Measure (EU-SPM) – to address these concerns. The EU-SPM compares household income to an expenditure-based threshold derived from typical household spending on food, clothing, shelter and utilities, and is adjusted for variation in housing costs within countries. The EU-SPM closely mirrors the U.S. Supplemental Poverty Measure. Applying the EU-SPM to EU-SILC over 2004–2024, we find that the measure tracks material hardship and subjective poverty more closely than the AROP both across countries and within countries over time. Across 290 validation tests, the EU-SPM performs significantly better in 168 and the AROP in only 8. We propose the EU-SPM as a supplement to the EU's existing poverty indicators and discuss the data investments that would support its regular production.

Pages: 70 pages
Date: 2026-10
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://oms-inet.files.svdcdn.com/production/files ... 26.pdf?dm=1793275977 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:amz:wpaper:2026-30

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in INET Oxford Working Papers from Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by INET Oxford admin team ().