Mitigating Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Data: Evidence from Sports Tourism
John Whitehead (),
Melissa S. Weddell and
Peter Groothuis ()
No 14-06, Working Papers from Department of Economics, Appalachian State University
One of the major criticisms of stated preference data is hypothetical bias. Using a unique data set of both stated and actual behavior we test for hypothetical bias of stated preference survey responses. We consider whether respondents tend to overstate their participatory sporting event behavior ex ante when compared to their actual behavior at different registration fees. We find that behavioral intentions accurately predicts actual behavior at a middle level of respondent certainty, over predicts actual behavior at a lower level of certainty and under predicts behavior at a higher level of certainty. This suggests that respondent uncertainty corrections can be used to mitigate hypothetical bias. Stated preference data can be used better understand actual behavior in situations where no data exist. Key Words: Hypothetical bias, stated preference data
JEL-codes: L83 Q26 Q51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ger, nep-spo and nep-tur
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: MITIGATING HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN STATED PREFERENCE DATA: EVIDENCE FROM SPORTS TOURISM (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:apl:wpaper:14-06
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Department of Economics, Appalachian State University Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by O. Ashton Morgan ().