Development of benchmarking investment real estate: the Dutch experience

Bert Teuben, Mark Clacy-Jones and Peter Hobbs

ERES from European Real Estate Society (ERES)

Abstract: In the 90’s the real estate investment environment, when most of the real estate indexes in Europe started, differed a lot from the current environment. Asset owners were often in full control of all the different real estate investment activities sometimes from portfolio management up to the property management at that time. The separation into different organizations (portfolio management to asset management) could result in agency problems. In parallel those indexes have shifted from (peer group) market indicators for transparency to independent financial benchmarks. Also asset owners and management houses often operate globally what wasn’t the case a couple of decades ago and both have to show their value added. This paper will look more in detail in the developments in the Netherlands and in particular of the IPD Netherlands index. Besides describing those trends some results will highlight the performance differences within that index, like spread of returns, segment returns and attribution analyses.

JEL-codes: R3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-01-01
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2016-277 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2016_277

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in ERES from European Real Estate Society (ERES) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Architexturez Imprints ().