Dual Process Intuitions: Consumers' Beliefs about Persuasion Processing Drive Morality of Marketing Communications

Zarema Khon, Yi-Ju Chen, Yvetta Simonyan, Haiming Hang and Samuel G.B. Johnson
Additional contact information
Zarema Khon: Nazarbayev University, Graduate School of Business
Yi-Ju Chen: University of Bath School of Management
Yvetta Simonyan: University of Bath School of Management
Haiming Hang: University of Bath School of Management
Samuel G.B. Johnson: University of Waterloo, Department of Psychology

No 2022/07, Working Papers from Nazarbayev University, Graduate School of Business

Abstract: Consumers tend to dislike companies that use immoral marketing persuasion tactics. How do consumers decide what persuasion is morally acceptable and what persuasion is not? Three studies show that morality of marketing persuasion depends on consumers' beliefs about information processing - Dual Process Intuitions. If consumers think persuasion aims at emotions and intuition - bypassing deliberative reasoning - they will evaluate it as more immoral and manipulative than persuasion believed to be processed deliberately. This is because consumers find system 1 processing (fast and effortless; e.g., encountering fear appeal ad) more automatic than system 2 processing (slow and effortful; e.g., reading about a product). Since system 2 (rather than system 1) persuasion is considered less immoral, it yields greater positive attitude change than that of system 1. These findings contribute to the literature on lay theories about persuasion, beliefs about information processing, and morality in marketing. Practitioners may use these results to better tailor their persuasion messages, especially if their customers are usually sensitive to persuasion - by creating the perception of autonomous choice using system 2 persuasion.

Keywords: beliefs; dual process theory; persuasion knowledge; brand attitudes; lay theories (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 50 pages
Date: 2022-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mkt
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hbPhGGyeqXA0GetrPGP94iPCviiPR1fL/view First version, 2022 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:asx:nugsbw:2022-07

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Nazarbayev University, Graduate School of Business Nazarbayev University Graduate School of Business 42 (C3) block 53 Kabanbay Batyr Ave Nur-Sultan city, Republic of Kazakhstan, 010000. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Aigerim Yergabulova ().