Conclusions and policy recommendations for the E.U. Water Framework Directive
Phoebe Koundouri (),
Paul Jeffrey and
No 602, DEOS Working Papers from Athens University of Economics and Business
The purpose of this final chapter is to identify the common themes of the three projects (WSM, Medis, and Aquadapt), to integrate and harmonise the results and approaches adopted by each, and to discuss conclusions and potential policy implications that can feed into the EU Water Framework Directive. The knowledge that has emerged from the three projects has been principally obtained from case study analyses. These have examined competing water use patterns, compared governance structures and how these have evolved in response to scarcity and structural and non-structural instruments to address water deficiency. The experiences and lessons learned from these studies are summarised below. First however we briefly describe the general circumstances, or pressures and driving forces, that are common to the case studies examined in the ARID cluster of projects.
Keywords: EU Water Framework Directive; Policy recommendations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Published in Water Management in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions: Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Downloads: (external link)
http://wpa.deos.aueb.gr/docs/Chapter10.pdf First version (application/pdf)
Working Paper: Conclusions and policy recommendations for the E.U. Water Framework Directive (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aue:wpaper:0602
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in DEOS Working Papers from Athens University of Economics and Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Series data maintained by Ekaterini Glynou ().