Comparing two simulation approaches of an energy-emissions model: Debating analytical depth with policymakers' expectations

Phoebe Koundouri, Angelos Alamanos, Giannis Arampatzidis, Stathis Devves and Jeffrey D Sachs

No 2528, DEOS Working Papers from Athens University of Economics and Business

Abstract: As global commitments to decarbonization intensify, energy-emission models are becoming increasingly vital for policymaking, offering data-driven insights to evaluate the feasibility and impact of climate strategies. These models help governments design evidence-based policies, assess mitigation pathways, and ensure alignment with national and international targets, such as the Paris Agreement and the EU Green Deal. Researchers often spend a lot of time considering their modelling choices to develop the best possible tools in terms of data-requirements, accuracy, computational demand, while there is always a 'debate' of complexity versus explicability and ready-to-use models for policymaking. Especially for energy-emissions models, given their increasing policy-relevance, and the need to provide insights fast for short-term policies (e.g. 2030, or 2050 net-zero goals), such considerations become increasingly pressing. In this paper, we present two different versions of the same energy-emissions model, and we run them for the same study area, planning horizon, and scenario analysis. The two versions differ only in how they approach complexity: Version1 is a more 'detailed', complex model, while Version2 is a 'simpler' and less data-hungry one. A set of evaluation criteria was then used to qualitatively compare these two versions, based on modelling- and policymaking-related considerations, debating modelers' and policymakers' expectations and preferences. We reflect on best modelling practices, discuss different goal-dependent approaches, providing useful guidance for modelers and policymakers.

Keywords: Energy-emissions modelling; Decarbonization pathways; Model development; LEAP; Models to policy. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-03-28
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://wpa.deos.aueb.gr/docs/2025.GCH2.models.comparison.pdf First version (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aue:wpaper:2528

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in DEOS Working Papers from Athens University of Economics and Business Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ekaterini Glynou ().