 Earnings and InequalityMichael Keating No 460, CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University Abstract: Despite strong economic growth and low inflation, many Australians believe that the benefits and costs have not been fairly shared and that inequality has been rising. Indeed, according to Newspoll, 'by a margin of 70-28 per cent, Australians would prefer the gap between rich and poor to get smaller rather than have the nation's overall wealth grow as quickly as possible' (The Australian, 17/06/00). This paper examines the apparent increase in the dispersion of earnings, which is central to the concern about rising inequality. The major finding is that the widening dispersion of earnings is principally due to changes in the structure of labour demand in favour of more skilled jobs. Relative rates of pay for major occupation groups appear to have hardly varied over the last twenty-five years. By contrast full-time employment grew strongly in the 1990s in the most highly skilled and paid occupation groups, and fell in the middle and lower skilled occupation groups. Part-time employment did increase substantially in some of the lower skilled occupation groups, but other studies have shown that the increase in total hours worked was skewed heavily in favour of the most skilled occupation groups. When individual occupations are grouped according to their level of pay it was found that the increase in employment accounted for most of the increase in the dispersion of male earnings and practically all of the increase in the dispersion of female earnings. To a limited extent the position of males in the top earnings deciles was also reinforced by their pay increasing a little faster than for the other deciles. But the increase in female pay was much the same for all earnings deciles, with no systematic tendency for it to be faster at the top, middle or bottom of the earnings distribution. The paper then considers what this changing job mix implies for policy directed to maintaining income equality. The stability of relative wage rates suggests that changes in the system of relative wage determination would not help to reduce inequality. Instead the focus must be on job creation. It is argued that aggregate wage restraint, encouraged through a wage-tax trade-off, is the most promising way to increase the employment content of economic growth, while avoiding further increases in inequality. In addition, changes in the structure of demand and technology are biasing the pattern of employment change so that a substantial expansion in the quantity and nature of education and training will be necessary to allow disadvantaged people to take up the jobs that are being created. Over time a more equal society is likely to depend on leveling up by further increasing the proportion of people in highly skilled and paid jobs, rather than leveling down by seeking to return to the past structure of employment. Pages: 36 pages Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:auu:dpaper:460 Access Statistics for this paper More papers in CEPR Discussion Papers from Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.