How to Design the Ask? Funding Units vs. Giving Money
Johannes Diederich,
Raphael Epperson and
Timo Goeschl
No 698, Working Papers from University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics
Abstract:
Charities frequently deviate from the standard donation scheme in which potential donors are asked how much money they are willing to give. Instead, they ask donors to choose how many units of a charitable good (e.g. meals, bed nets, or trees) to fund at a given unit price. In an onlne donation experiment, we compare the performance of such a "unit donation" scheme with that of the standard "money donation" and investigate the factors that could explain differences. We find that despite the additional demands that it imposes on the charity, the unit donation does not outperform the money donation scheme in terms of overall donations. It significantly differs, however, with respect tot the propensity to give. The sign of the difference depends on the granularity of the scheme. When one unit of the charitable good is cheap, unit donation schemes increase the propensity to give and can serve as an effective tool for recruiting donors.
Keywords: charitable giving; unit donation; aid effectiveness; restricted choice; Framing-Effekt (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021-02-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe and nep-exp
Note: This paper is part of http://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver/view/schriftenreihen/sr-3.html
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-heidok-293447 Frontdoor page on HeiDOK (text/html)
https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/volltextserver ... eschl_2021_dp698.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: How to Design the Ask? Funding Units vs. Giving Money (2023) 
Working Paper: How to Design the Ask? Funding Units vs. Giving Money (2022) 
Working Paper: How to Design the Ask? Funding Units vs. Giving Money (2022) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:awi:wpaper:0698
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Gabi Rauscher ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).