The role of randomized field trials in social science research: a perspective from evaluations of reforms of social welfare programs

Robert Moffitt

No 23/02, CeMMAP working papers from Institute for Fiscal Studies

Abstract: One of the areas of policy research where randomized field trials have been utilized mostintensively is welfare reform. Starting in the late 1960s with experimental tests of a negativeincome tax and continuing through current experimental tests of recent welfare reforms,randomized evaluations have played a strong and increasing role in informing policy. This paper reviews the record of these experiments and assesses the implications of that record for theuse of randomization. The review demonstrates that, while randomized field trials in the areaof welfare reform have been professionally conducted and well-run, and have yielded muchvaluable and credible information, their usefulness has been limited by a number of weaknesses,some of which are inherent in the method and some of which result from constraints imposed bythe political process. The conclusion is that randomized field trials have an important butlimited role to play in future welfare reform evaluations, and that it is essential that they besupplemented by nonexperimental research.

Date: 2002-12-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cemmap.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/CWP2302.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: The Role of Randomized Field Trials in Social Science Research: A Perspective from Evaluations of Reforms of Social Welfare Programs (2003)
Working Paper: The role of randomized field trials in social science research: a perspective from evaluations of reforms of social welfare programs (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:azt:cemmap:23/02

DOI: 10.1920/wp.cem.2002.2302

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CeMMAP working papers from Institute for Fiscal Studies Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dermot Watson ().