Falsification and refutation

Nicolae Sfetcu ()
Additional contact information
Nicolae Sfetcu: Romanian Academy - Romanian Committee for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology (CRIFST), History of Science Division (DIS)

Working Papers from MultiMedia Publishing

Abstract: A scientific theory, according to Popper, can be legitimately saved from falsification by introducing an auxiliary hypothesis to generate new, falsifiable predictions. Also, if there are suspicions of bias or error, the researchers might introduce an auxiliary falsifiable hypothesis that would allow testing. But this technique can not solve the problem in general, because any auxiliary hypothesis can be clenged in the same way, ad infinitum. To solve this regression, Popper introduces the idea of a basic statement, an empirical statement that can be used both to determine whether a given theory is falsifiable and, if necessary, to corroborate falsification assumptions.

Keywords: falsification; refutation; falsifiability; Karl Popper; science (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 5 pages
Date: 2019-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.telework.ro/en/e-books/falsification-and-refutation/ (application/pdf)
https://www.telework.ro/en/falsification-and-refutation/ (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bbp:wpaper:enfalsification

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22162.09923

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from MultiMedia Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Nicolae Sfetcu ().