The Impact of Repeated Lying on Survey Results
Thomas Chesney () and
Kay Penny ()
Additional contact information
Thomas Chesney: Nottingham University Business School
Kay Penny: Edinburgh Napier University, http://www.napier.ac.uk/business-school/OurStaff/BusinessSchoolStaff/Pages/KayPenny.aspx
ICBBR Working Papers from International Centre for Behavioural Business Research
A Monte Carlo simulation study is carried out to examine the effects on study results of subjects completing a survey more than once. Three strategies subjects might use to do this - which is known as farming - are studied. Findings show that farming influences results and can cause both statistical hypothesis testing Type I (false positive) and Type II (false negative) errors in unpredictable ways. A literature review from one management sub-discipline (marketing) was undertaken to investigate how common problem farming might be. Results suggest that while the incentivised survey method which might encourage farming is popular and some approaches to data collection make it difficult to prevent farming altogether, it is unlikely to be commonplace as many research methods prevent it.
Keywords: Survey; Incentive; Online (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cmp and nep-mic
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bbr:workpa:13
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in ICBBR Working Papers from International Centre for Behavioural Business Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Laure Cabantous ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).