Escalation Bargaining: Theoretical Analysis and Experimental Test
Swee-Hoon Chuah (),
Robert Hoffmann () and
Jeremy Larner ()
Additional contact information
Jeremy Larner: Nottingham University Business School
ICBBR Working Papers from International Centre for Behavioural Business Research
The standard chicken game is a popular model of certain important real scenarios but does not allow for the escalation behaviour these are typically associated with. This is problematic if the critical, final decisions in these scenarios are sensitive to previous escalation. We introduce and analyse, theoretically and by experiment, a new game which permits escalation behaviour. Compared with an equivalent chicken game, Pareto-suboptimal outcomes are significantly more frequent. This result is inconsistent with our rational choice analysis and possible psychological roots are explored.
Keywords: Escalation; Brinkmanship; Chicken game; Experiments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 C78 C91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe, nep-exp and nep-gth
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Working Paper: Escalation Bargaining: Theoretical Analysis and Experimental Test (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bbr:workpa:16
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in ICBBR Working Papers from International Centre for Behavioural Business Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Laure Cabantous ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).