Strategic Tax Competition: An Experimental Study
ICBBR Working Papers from International Centre for Behavioural Business Research
We study the effect of a payoff advantage, symmetric payoff change and policymakers interaction on choices in tax competition games. To examine the first two effects a standard symmetric game is respectively compared to an asymmetric game where one player has a payoff advantage and to another symmetric game where both players have symmetrically higher payoffs. When payoffs are asymmetric, we find that if policymakers have a payoff disadvantage they are more likely to compete. Instead policymakers with a payoff advantage are keener to tax above equilibrium. Our results also show there is a payoff size effect where choices are brought closer to equilibrium when payoffs are symmetrically higher. These two effects are further studied when players interact repeatedly. With repeated interaction cooperation is sustained only in the symmetric games but fail to materialise in the asymmetric game. A regression analysis of our results reveals further differences between these games.
Keywords: Tax Competition; Experimental Economics; Asymmetry. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C92 H21 H73 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp, nep-gth, nep-mic, nep-pbe and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Journal Article: Strategic Tax Competition: An Experimental Study (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bbr:workpa:5
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in ICBBR Working Papers from International Centre for Behavioural Business Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Laure Cabantous ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).