Competing Ecosystem Services: an Assessment of Carbon and Timber in the Tropical Forests of Central America

Kaysara Khatun ()

No 2010-14, Working Papers from BC3

Abstract: The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA 2005) has classified a number of ecosystems good and services (EGS) provided by tropical forests, namely cultural, provisioning, regulatory and support services. The primary focus of this paper is to carry out an economic assessment by comparing the financial costs and returns of selected EGS, namely carbon and timber in the tropical forests of Central America. Timber is unlike the other EGS provided by forests in that it competes with the other services, i.e. biodiversity, recreation and water services. Carbon storage is the non-timber value most often included in forest accounts and can be equated directly with timber available in terms of biomass content. The study provides a quantitative appraisal of the carbon and timber stocks and flows of tropical (primary) forests and the associated trade-offs by evaluating them simultaneously using data and market values from a number of sources. The provision of reliable and accurate estimates of the economic value of these services is crucial to plan adequate conservation policies that encourage the protection and sustainable management of tropical forests such as those under REDD/REDD+. Results indicate that the economic return for managing natural forests is influenced by timber and carbon prices as well as the discount rate applied. Timber on face value is the better land use option; however, there are many issues that need to be considered when valuing timber, especially regarding the management regimes. Revenues under REDD/ REDD+ option would be higher if co-benefits, which include monies from the sustainable extraction of timber under Sustainable Forestry Management (SFM) are considered.

Keywords: Carbon; Environmental Goods and Services; Forests; REDD/REDD+; Timber (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010-10
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr and nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bc3research.org/index.php?option=com_wp ... 5&repec=1&Itemid=279 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden (http://www.bc3research.org/index.php?option=com_wpapers&task=downpubli&iddoc=25&repec=1&Itemid=279 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.bc3research.org/index.php?option=com_wpapers&task=downpubli&iddoc=25&repec=1&Itemid=279)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bcc:wpaper:2010-14

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from BC3
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sergio Henrique Faria ().